The Marie Stopes
clinic in Belfast has now been open for a few weeks and continues to need the
support of everyone who believes in a woman’s right to choose. Marie Stopes has
asked supporters not to stand outside the clinic (alongside the clinic’s
opponents) and so a march of support has been organised this Saturday in
Belfast City Centre: Assemble outside the Art College at 1.30pm and march from
York Street to Belfast City Hall, where a rally will take place. The march is
open to women and men.
The clinic does, of course, offer a wide range of sexual
health services as well as early stage medical abortions within the law. We
should remember that the opening of an alternative option for contraceptive
advice and provision is likely to reduce the necessity for abortion rather than
add to it. Therefore everyone who believes in women’s choice should support the
clinic, even if they personally would not opt for abortion.
It is particularly
important for everyone in favour to come along because a number of the ‘usual
suspects’ will be missing. All the main political parties are either
anti-abortion or allow a conscience vote – which means it’s OK to have on your
conscience that women travel to Britain for abortions, or order pills on the
internet. So the stalwarts of many demonstrations, the SDLP and Sinn Féin, won’t
be there. The Greens may be, as they allow a conscience vote.
But this is yet
another reason why Northern Ireland needs the Labour Party. At our General
Meeting on 21st September, we voted unanimously for the extension of
the 1967 Abortion Act to Northern Ireland. Our position is set out in the
statement below:
The Labour Party in Northern Ireland is proud to support the opening of
the Marie Stopes clinic in Belfast.
We stand firmly for the right of women to comprehensive sexual health
and family services, including the provision of medical abortions up to nine
weeks of pregnancy.
Abortion is technically illegal in Northern Ireland but exceptions are
made where the woman is at risk of long term damage to her physical or mental
health. This means that safe and legal terminations are difficult to obtain,
even in the most extreme of circumstances.
We are still the only part of the UK where women don’t have the legal
right to an abortion - the 1967 Abortion Act, which empowered women in England,
Wales and Scotland was never extended to Northern Ireland.
Since 1967, roughly 70,000 women have travelled to Great Britain for
private terminations. Last year alone, over 1000 women travelled to England for
such procedures, at a cost of around £2000 each.
The establishment of the Marie Stopes clinic will reduce the number of
unfortunates who are forced to travel to England. We welcome that, as we
welcome the introduction of a range of sexual and reproductive health services
which will be available in the clinic.
But the establishment of the Marie Stopes clinic on its own is not
enough.
In September, Labour’s
Northern Ireland members voted unanimously for the extension of the 1967 Act to
Northern Ireland.
We are not alone. Most opinion in Northern Ireland is pro choice, yet
abortion here is still governed by the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
The LPNI recognise the reality that the majority of people here support
liberalisation of the abortion laws, not further restrictions. It is easy to
take the moral high ground and deny women in Northern Ireland the right to
choice, but moralising can neither reduce crisis pregnancy nor help those
forced to travel to Great Britain every year for an abortion.
Women in Birmingham and Bristol have abortion rights if they need them,
why not women in Ballymena and Belfast?
It is time that our Health Minister - whether it is Edwin Poots or Jim
Wells - recognises that you can’t have maternal health without reproductive
health. And reproductive health includes contraception and family planning and
access to legal, safe abortion.
13 comments:
Thank the skies for people like you Jenny...I too believe that women should have the right to be owners of their own uterus's...and I shall be there tomorrow.
Just look at what some women in Northern Ireland are writing about this issue...under the guise of 'christianity'...such women with attitudes I cannot believe exist...
http://thetruthshallsetyoufreeblog.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/the-reds-are-coming-why-to-support-stopes-clinic-naturally/
http://thetruthshallsetyoufreeblog.wordpress.com/2012/11/09/they-all-with-one-consent-began-to-make-excuse/
Freedoms are not endowed by the power of legislation of governments...they are won by those who fight for them day after day after day....
Too true, Wendy. I hope we get a big turnout tomorrow and I'm not at all surprised at the links you have provided. Although I worry more about our politicians' attitudes because they have more power.
When you get the time Jenny, take a look at this exchange that happened on my blog recently...
http://www.culturedviews.com/northern-irelands-dup-politician-jim-wells-and-his-twisted-pro-life-statement/2012/08/24/view.htm
Miss Susan is the owner of the aforementioned blog and intends to march tomorrow with the evangelists who oppose choice for women...in fact, they oppose women even being able to breathe without permission I suspect, lol.
I am Susan-Anne White of the blog that Wendy finds so objectionable.I challenged Wendy to a public debate but I do not believe it will ever happen.So, I herewith challenge you to a public debate about Feminism versus Biblical womanhood.I am not an academic but I can defend my Biblical position. Now, will you accept the challenge?
Absolutely not, because your position is based on emotion rather than reason. You belive in control by an external being and I belive women should make their own decisions.
Obviously 'believe' although 'belive' is telling!
Why are you feminists so afraid of a public debate? Is there not one of you who will engage in debate with a 53 year old married woman with one child.I believe that feminism has harmed women and men and society itself. You are a lecturer at Queen's and the University facilitates debates from time to time. Perhaps you could suggest a feminist who is willing to take part in a debate.
What Jenny said. It's all very simple. There are only two positions. Either a woman can choose for herself what to do with her body or someone else tells her what to do with it. What gives anyone else the right to make the choice for her?
'What Jenny said. It's all very simple. There are only two positions. Either a woman can choose for herself what to do with her body or someone else tells her what to do with it.'
Except feminists have never believed that, if they believed in allowing a woman to choose what she does with her body, then they would not be opposed to pornography or sex work where both of the latter involve consent.
Paul - not all feminists are opposed to pornography or sex work, which I'm sure you know. Personally I am, because I think they damage the participants and also the rest of us (women and men) through the attitudes towards sex which they promote in those who use both. I don't believe sex should be commodified. Most people I know don't agree with me.
In the case of abortion, the 'right to choose' impacts on a small number of people (yes, including the father, if the woman is in touch with him) and the woman has to make a difficult decision which may or may not be to have an abortion. The 'right to choose' provides a framework which makes that possible but it does not force the woman to go down that route if she feels it's not right for her. I don't think the comparison you make is helpful.
Jenny, much as I respect you, you are overlooking a remarkable contradiction. 'because I think they damage the participants' Seriously and abortion does not 'damage the participants'? I support 110% the removal of paternalistic (or should that be maternalistic) laws that impinge on the freedom of an individual to do what they like with their body. Of course a strong feminist discourse agrees with me on this. But saying to a woman or man 'look you do not have the option to utilise your sexuality and body parts to make money' however you do have the right to expect state support in removing an unwanted pregnancy. That is hypocrisy that some parts of the hysterical feminist lobby embrace (for instance that ridiculous ideologue McKinnon). Besides personal likes and dislikes I have to ask what in your opinion should the law be as that is what counts? I am willing to agree with you on abortion up to a point.
Paul - Obviously there are times when abortion damages the participants, in other cases it doesn't. My point about pornography is that it has wider social impact in that it affects the way women are seen more generally. Not sure how to put that into legal terms. Like you, I shy away from the word 'ban' but if it were made more difficult for men to access prostitutes then that would be a start.
Jenny, Susan-Anne White has this habit of challenging people to these 'public debates' that never materialise. I accepted her offer once and she backed out just as fast citing some ridiculous reason. You cannot debate or reason with someone whose ideas come from the bible and nowhere else, their minds are too closed, too narrow. They have no ideas of their own so they are a waste of time. Her blog contains some of the most vile racist, bigoted, misogynistic content I have ever seen. She even targets disabled athletes for criticism. The woman is downright nasty.
Post a Comment